Whitman v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
HOWELL, Judge.
This is an action for an increase in fixed fee in the amount of $126,216.60, under a cost-plus-a-fixed-fee contract. By order of the court dated October ll, 1948, the proceedings in this case were, on defendant’s motion pursuant to old Rule 39(b), limited to the preliminary question of the validity of certain releases furnished by plaintiffs to defendant.
It is plaintiffs’ position that the releases are invalid, and that even if valid, they do not bar the claim here asserted. Defendant contends that the releases are valid, and that they preclude recovery of any increase in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Callahan Walker Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
- W. E. Callahan Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
- Winn-Senter Const. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
- MacDougald Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Copco Steel & Engineering Co. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Moran Bros., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Martin J. Simko Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- Arthur Venneri Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Thomas Creek Lumber & Log Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996