Legal Opinion
UNIFUND CCR, LLC v. EKPO
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided July 22, 2014No. 112496PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH RAPP, Judge.
{1 The trial court defendant, Nsima S. Ekpo (Ekpo), appeals an Order granting summary judgment to the plaintiff, Unifund CCR, LLC (Unifund). This appeal proceeds under the provisions of Okla. Sup.Ct. Rule 1.36, 12 0.9.2011, ch. 15, app. 2.
BACKGROUND
T2 Unifund is a collection firm and the plaintiff in a suit against Ekpo. The petition alleged that Unifund is the successor in interest to a credit card debt Ekpo incurred with Citibank, N.A. Ekpo denied the claim and alleged affirmative defenses, including that Unifund was not the real party in interest. A month later, Ekpo…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Fent v. Contingency Review BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Young Men's Christian Ass'n of Greater Tulsa v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Kirkpatrick v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Bird v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ASSET ACCEPTANCE L.L.C. v. WHITECourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- ASSET ACCEPTANCE L.L.C. v. WHITECourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014