Legal Opinion

Vincent De Frontbrune v. Alan Wofsy

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 26, 2016No. 14-15790PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

Justice Holmes once observed that foreign legal systems can appear to the uninitiated “like a wall of stone,” impenetrable and unyielding. Diaz v. Gonzalez, 261 U.S. 102, 106, 43 S.Ct. 286, 67 L.Ed. 550 (1923) (Holmes, J.). For over a century, the federal courts attempted to scale this stone wall by treating questions of foreign law as questions of fact to be pleaded and proved. But over the years, this method proved unsatisfactory, obscuring rather than illuminating the content and nuance of foreign laws. Finally, in 1966, following a proliferation of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Yahoo! Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme Et L'antisemitismeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Shelby Roberts v. Carter-Young, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025
  2. G and G Productions LLC v. Rita RusicCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Coeur D'Alene Tribe v. Steve HawksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Fahmy v. Jay-ZCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. Knight Capital Partners Corp. v. Henkel AG & Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API