Legal Opinion

Reiss v. Maynard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 10, 1989No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts with costs, complaint reinstated and injunction granted, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiffs claim an easement by prescription over lands owned by defendants and used as a right-of-way. The right-of-way, known as the Linwood Drive Extension, is a dirt or gravel road which connects to the public highway and runs approximately 1,000 feet through defendants’ property. The extension continues in a northerly direction through a 181-acre tract of land which plaintiffs purchased in 1959. In that same year, plaintiffs commenced…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Di Leo v. Pecksto Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Pirman v. ConferNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Beutler v. MaynardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Beutler v. MaynardNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Weinberg v. ShaflerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mandia v. King Lumber & Plywood Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Alexy v. SalvadorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Reiss v. MaynardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Chamberlain v. Town of PortvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Pierce v. FrostAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API