Legal Opinion

Reiss v. Maynard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 1, 1991No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following Memorandum: On a prior appeal, we held that plaintiffs’ proof at trial established the necessary elements of a prescriptive easement over defendants’ land, and we enjoined defendants from interfering with plaintiffs’ use of the easement over a right-of-way known as the Linwood Drive Extension (Reiss v Maynard, 148 AD2d 996). Thereafter, the parties disagreed over the specific content of several decretal paragraphs of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Di Leo v. Pecksto Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. American Bank Note Co. v. New York Elevated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Antonopulos v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Antonopulos v. Postal Telegraph Cable CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Cady v. Springfield Water Works Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pevear v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  2. Wilcox v. RealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Bova v. VinciguerraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Cronk v. TaitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Reilly v. AchitoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API