Legal Opinion
Beutler v. Maynard
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 25, 1982PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The factual determinations made by the Appellate Division more nearly conform to the weight of the evidence, and we find no error in that court’s application of the pertinent rules of law. Respondents Susanne M. Beutler and Martha Randazzo demonstrated their entitlement by prescription to free access to and use of the right of way known as Linwood Drive Extension.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
2Cited by30 opinions
- Ray v. Beacon Hudson Mountain Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- City of Tonawanda v. Ellicott Creek Homeowners Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Coup. v. BarthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Miller v. RauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- DERMODY, BRIAN S. v. TILTON, DARRYL D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.