Legal Opinion
Romala Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 18, 1990No. 609-87CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action for breach of contract, brought under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (1982) (“CDA”). Romala Corporation contends that the Government improperly terminated a contract between it and Romala for the construction of a United States Postal Service (“Postal Service” or “Government”) facility in Dragoon, Arizona. After trial, and consideration of the applicable law, the court concludes that Romala is not entitled to recover.
BACKGROUND
Sometime in 1984 the Postal Service, Western Region, determined that a new postal facility was needed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- A. B. Small Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Ryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Prestex Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Darwin Construction Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Romala Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Best Foam Fabricators, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Gregory v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997