Legal Opinion

Best Foam Fabricators, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 18, 1997No. 94-1036CPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEROW, Judge.

Following a trial in this action, plaintiff Best Foam Fabricators, Inc. (“Best Foam”) seeks damages from defendant for breach of contract. Best Foam asserts that it entered into a valid and binding contract with the United States, Department of the Navy, Aviation Supply Office (“ASO”), for the production of foam fuel cells for use in Navy helicopters. Best Foam alleges further that the government breached the contract by withholding information Best Foam needed to complete performance and by refusing to recognize the existence of a valid contract. Best Foam seeks damages…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  2. Honeywell, Inc. v. The United States v. Haz-Tad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  3. Kalvar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  4. Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. John Reiner & Company, Individually and to the Use of Kurz & Root Company (Incorporated) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  2. Keeter Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Daniel E. Terreri & Sons, Inc. v. Mahoning County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Tigerswan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. Praecomm, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API