Legal Opinion

John Briggs v. Guy Goodwin

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 17, 1983No. 80-2269PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAZELON, Senior Circuit Judge:

This civil suit arises out of criminal proceedings brought against appellants in 1972. Appellants1 allege that Guy Goodwin, an attorney with the Department of Justice, misrepresented to them in open court that one of their comrades was not a government informant. They claim that this misrepresentation, which Goodwin left uncorrected, violated their Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel because it led them to share various aspects of their defense with the informant. They seek both compensatory and punitive damages in a “Bivens-type” cause…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. Shillinger v. HaworthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. Kenneth W. Martin v. John P. Malhoyt, John Doe(s) Shirley Ann Stevens v. David H. Stover, John DoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  4. John Edmond v. United States Postal Service General CounselCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  5. People v. ErvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API