McDermott v. City of Seattle
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
The plaintiff alleges that he is conducting a barber shop on private property in the city of Seattle in compliance with state laws, is duly licensed as a barber, and employs in his shop 15 or more licensed barbers; that he has $25,000 invested in his shop, and has for more than 25 years conducted his shop as “open hours,” providing barber service until 11 p. m. every week day, which service is sustained by persons engaged in water, rail, motor and motor bus transportation, and other persons so engaged as to make them wholly dependable upon late hours barber shops for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Miller v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Board of Barber Examiners v. CloudIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
- City of Louisville v. KuhnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- Salt Lake City v. ReveneUtah Supreme Court · 1942
- Wilson v. City of ZanesvilleOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Ex Parte JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.