Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Johnson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 22, 1943No. A-10423PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, P. J.

The city of Oklahoma City is operating under a. charter commission form of government. Under the general powers granted to it by its charter, it passed an ordinance pertaining to the barber business as follows.

“8-27. Barber Shop. Closed on Sunday. It shall be unlawful and an offense for any person to keep open any shop or place of business in said city, for the purpose of carrying on the business of barbering, or to engage in such business, on the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday.”

On Sunday, May 30, 1943, the petitioner, Art Johnson, who operates a barbershop with a beauty parlor…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Miller v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Keokee Consolidated Coke Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Herrin v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Ex Parte HiggsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. State v. McGeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. State v. GrabinskiWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Ex Parte PappeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API