Legal Opinion
Stern v. Cingular Wireless Corp.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 28, 2006No. CV 05-8842 CASCTXPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNYDER, District Judge.
Proceedings: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION (filed June 8, 2006)
I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
The question presented on this motion is the enforceability of an arbitration clause contained in a wireless telephone service contract between plaintiff Heather Stern and defendant AT & T Wireless Services, Inc. (“AT & T Wireless”). On November 1. 2004, plaintiff signed a written agreement (“Service Agreement”) with AT & T Wireless. Declaration of Cynthia Hennessy in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration (“Hennessy Decl.”) Ex. C. 1 At that time,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- McArdle v. AT & T MOBILITY LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Trompeter v. Ally Financial, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Clift v. RDP Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2016
- Stiener v. Apple Computer, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.