Legal Opinion

United States v. Mahone

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided July 29, 1982No. ACM 23406 to 23408PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

The above named accused were tried in common by general court-martial for rape, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 920. Specifically, it was alleged that each raped Mrs. C.G.S. and aided and abetted his two co-accused in an act of rape. Contrary to his pleas Mahone was found guilty of rape and aiding and abetting Wilson in an act of rape;1 Stanton was convicted as charged; and Wilson was found guilty of rape.2 Ma-hone was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, three years’ confinement at hard labor, and total forfeitures;…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. McQueenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. United States v. HendersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. Pradlik v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  4. United States v. ShortUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. StewardU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  2. United States v. MobleyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  3. United States v. WordenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  4. United States v. CourtU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  5. United States v. EvansUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API