Legal Opinion
Blier v. Inhabitants of Town of Fort Kent
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided February 19, 1971PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFRESNE, Chief Justice.
On February 19, 1969 Emile Blier (Plaintiff) recovered judgments in the amount of eighty-four thousand seven hundred fifty-seven ($84,757.00) dollars respectively against both Defendants, the Town of Fort Kent and its employee, Clarence Blier. The Justice below ruled that at the time Plaintiff suffered his injuries the Town of Fort Kent through its employee, Clarence Blier, was engaged in a proprietary activity and the negligent conduct which gave rise to Plaintiff’s cause of action was not committed in the course of the Town’s discharge of any governmental or…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Chafor v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Darling v. Augusta Mental Health InstituteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
- Finks v. Maine State Highway CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Davies v. City of BathSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Emery Waterhouse Co. v. LeaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Town of Arundel v. SwainSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.