Legal Opinion

Smith v. Radecki

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 2010No. S-13171PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHRISTEN, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Terry Smith injured his back while working for CSK Auto, Inc. (CSK) and brought a workers' compensation claim. CSK arranged for Dr. Patrick Radecki to perform an independent medical examination to assess Smith's condition. Dr. Radecki examined Smith and reported that he had no physical injury resulting from the incident. But Smith later underwent an MRI which revealed several spinal problems, including a Tarlov eyst. Smith filed suit against Dr. Radecki. His complaint included claims arising from Dr. Radecki's alleged failure to discover the existence…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Slack v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. Ritchie v. KrasnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. Martinez v. LewisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. Keene v. WigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. BellowsAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Cornelison v. TIG InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Michael L. Woodruff v. Stuart Gitlow, M.D.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
  4. Tagaban v. City of PelicanAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Farmer v. Alaska USA Title Agency, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API