Legal Opinion

United States v. Curcio

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided February 24, 1970No. Crim. 12625PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMBERS, Chief Judge.

Defendant Francis Curcio, together with defendant John Mentó, has been charged in a two count indictment with knowingly having . used extortionate means to collect an extension of credit and conspiring so to do, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 894 (Supp. IV, 1965-68) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1964).

Defendant Curcio’s motion to dismiss the indictment raises a number of distinct claims, each of which will be separately discussed. 1

I

CLAIM OF UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF TITLE II OF CONSUMER CREDIT PROTECTION ACT

Defendant claims that Title II of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, 18 U. S..C.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Willie H. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. NataleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Michael S. Polizzi, United States of America v. Joseph E. MatrangaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Frank JosephCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Gale Nace and Nathan J. Warren, Sr., United States of America v. Ned Warren, Sr., and Gale NaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API