United States v. Curcio
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
TIMBERS, Chief Judge.
Defendant Francis Curcio, together with defendant John Mentó, has been charged in a two count indictment with knowingly having . used extortionate means to collect an extension of credit and conspiring so to do, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 894 (Supp. IV, 1965-68) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1964).
Defendant Curcio’s motion to dismiss the indictment raises a number of distinct claims, each of which will be separately discussed. 1
I
CLAIM OF UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF TITLE II OF CONSUMER CREDIT PROTECTION ACT
Defendant claims that Title II of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, 18 U. S..C.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Willie H. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. NataleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Michael S. Polizzi, United States of America v. Joseph E. MatrangaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Frank JosephCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Gale Nace and Nathan J. Warren, Sr., United States of America v. Ned Warren, Sr., and Gale NaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.