Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance v. Administratia Asigurarilor De Stat

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 24, 1995No. 86 Civ. 2365 (DNE)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

EDELSTEIN, District Judge:

After failing to file a timely answer to plaintiffs amended complaint, Defendant Korean Reinsurance Corporation (“Korean Re” or “defendant”)1 now moves, pursuant to *197Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 6(b)(2) for an extension of time to answer plaintiffs amended complaint.

BACKGROUND

In a January 19, 1995, Opinion and Order, this Court granted plaintiffs motion for leave to amend its complaint. See Allstate Ins. Co. v. Administratia Asigurarilor De Stat, 875 F.Supp. 1022 (S.D.N.Y.1995). Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on May 3, 1995, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davidson v. KeenanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. Yonofsky v. WernickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  3. In Re Cosmopolitan Aviation Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  4. Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  5. Marane, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. McDonald Corporation & McDonald System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Perez-Denison v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of NorthwestDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
  2. Blissett v. CaseyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997
  3. Georgopolous v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  4. Trerotola v. Local 72 of the International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  5. Carlton Knowles, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated v. Jura, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API