Legal Opinion

Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 6, 1942No. 7899PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

This action is brought to recover treble damages for alleged violation by the defendants of the Sherman and Clayton Anti-Trust Acts. 15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq. Suit was filed in the District Court of New Jersey. That court granted the plaintiff’s petition for process and ordered the respective United States Marshals to serve the defendants in the districts wherein they resided, all outside the District of New Jersey. This was done on October 17, 18 and 21, 1940 respectively for various of the defendants. On November 7, the first of two stipulations was entered into by…

2Cited by55 opinions

  1. Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  2. Leo Vine v. Beneficial Finance Company, Inc., and Charles H. Dowd, Stuart A. Wixson, George J. Springer, C. H. Donohue and Crown Finance Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. Kem Search, Inc. v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  4. Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  5. Truth Seeker Co. v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API