Legal Opinion

Plotkin v. Realty Bond Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 8, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The issues are either in conflict or they are not determinative of the controversy. For this reason a new trial must be awarded. Bank v. Broom Co., 188 N. C., 508, 125 S. E., 12.

The third issue was apparently answered on the principle announced in Person v. Rountree, 2 N. C., 378, and consistently followed in this jurisdiction, that a grantee of lands will take according to the boundaries actually surveyed and pointed out at the time, notwithstanding a mistaken description inserted in the deed (Clarke v. Aldridge, 162 N. C., 326, 78 S. E., 216), but the answer to the fourth issue seems to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clarke v. AldridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Brown v. . CraigSuperior Court of North Carolina · 1796
  3. Holler v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Merchants National Bank v. Carolina Broom Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Chapman-Hunt Co. v. Haywood County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. T. L. Edge v. North State Feldspar Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Cody v. . EnglandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Newbern v. . GordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API