Legal Opinion

United States v. Nancy Mageno

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 11, 2014No. 12-10474PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge BERZON; Dissent by Judge WALLACE.

OPINION

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

Nancy Mageno’s godson, a leader of a methamphetamine conspiracy, did not speak English fluently, so Mageno translated telephone calls for him. As a result, Mageno was prosecuted for knowingly joining and participating in the drug conspiracy by fostering communication between its participants and her godson. In a separate disposition, we reject Mageno’s argument that the evidence against her was insufficient to sustain the conviction. Here, we consider related issues commendably raised by the government itself on…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. CazaresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Kenton Crowley v. Epicept Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Susan Tomsha-MiguelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. Nancy MagenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. James Brown v. Rawson-Neal Psychiatric Hosp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API