Legal Opinion
United States v. Cazares
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 14, 2015No. 06-50677, 07-50037, 06-50678, 06-50679PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PIERSOL, Senior District Judge:
A jury found defendants Fernando Ca-zares, Gilbert Saldana, Alejandro Martinez, and Porfirio Avila guilty of violating 18 U.S.C. § 241 by conspiring to intimidate African-American citizens in the Highland Park neighborhood of Los Ange-les and to deprive them of their constitutional right to “purchase, lease and hold real and personal property, and the right to occupy a dwelling, free from intimidation based on race.” The jury found defendants Cazares, Saldana, and Martinez guilty of violating 18 U.S.C. §§ 245(b)(2)(B), and 2(a) by shooting Kenneth Kurry…
2Cases cited90 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. Keith McGillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Anthony Reed v. Doug LieuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Valentino JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Visciotti v. MartelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Lidia RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.