Legal Opinion

Schurlknight v. City of North Charleston

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 26, 2001No. 3324PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHULER, Judge:

In a decision affirmed by the workers’ compensation commission and the circuit court, the single commissioner found Ralph Schurlknight’s claim for benefits barred by the statute of limitations. Schurlknight appeals. We affirm.

*47FACTS

Schurlknight worked as a fireman for the City of North Charleston from 1973 until August of 1997.1 Between 1976 and 1997, Schurlknight served as a captain and rode in the passenger seat of the fire truck between five and fifteen times per week. On each call, Schurlknight was exposed to the sirens and air horns which were several feet from his seat.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Dean v. Ruscon Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Talley v. South Carolina Higher Education Tuition Grants CommitteeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Stephen v. Avins Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Mauldin v. Dyna-Color/Jack RabbitSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wigfall v. Tideland Utilities, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Schurlknight v. City of North CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API