Legal Opinion
Mauldin v. Dyna-Color/Jack Rabbit
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided April 13, 1992No. 23637PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Finney, Justice:
This Court granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in this Workers’ Compensation case. Mauldin v. Dyna-Color, 303 S.C. 326, 400 S.E. (2d) 494 (Ct. App. 1990). The South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission) found that Petitioner Virginia Gaynell Mauldin was entitled to all medical care and compensation as provided by the South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) for an injury sustained on January 2,1985, but for which a claim was filed after the two-year statutory period for filing had expired.
The circuit court affirmed the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Santee Portland Cement Co. v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Gattis v. ChavezDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1976
- Ost v. Integrated Products, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- Davis v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Krell v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Shealy v. Aiken CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Lester v. South Carolina Workers' Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Peay v. U.S. Silica Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Johnston v. BowenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Brunell v. Wildwood Crest Police DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.