Legal Opinion

Schurlknight v. City of North Charleston

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 25, 2002No. 25561PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice MOORE:

This is a workers’ compensation case involving a repetitive trauma injury. 1 Petitioner Schurlknight (Claimant) sought benefits for noise-induced hearing loss. The single commissioner, the full commission, and the Court of Appeals 2 found his claim was barred by the two-year statute of limitations found in S.C.Code Ann. § 42-15-40 (Supp.2001). 3 We reverse and remand.

FACTS

The facts relevant to this issue are undisputed. Claimant worked as a fireman for more than twenty-four years. For most of this time he held the position of captain, requiring him to ride in the passenger seat…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Berry v. Boeing Military AirplanesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  2. Oscar Mayer & Co. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. King v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Mauldin v. Dyna-Color/Jack RabbitSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Lawson v. Lear Seating Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bass v. IsochemCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Harry v. Buse Timber & Sales, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Risor v. Nebraska BoilerNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Sanders v. MeadWestvaco Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Hartzell v. Palmetto Collision, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API