Legal Opinion

Ogilvie v. Hailey

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1918PublishedCited by 44 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Davidson County. —Hon. Jas. B. Newman, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chiee Justice. LaNsdeN

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The bill in this canse was filed to enjoin the collection of a privilege tax on automobiles used for pleasure, applicable to Davidson county. It is averred that the statute authorizing this tax is unconstitutional. A demurred was interposed, which was sustained by the chancellor, and the complainants have appealed to this court.

Some criticism is made of the form of the demurrer. It is insisted that it is too broad in its terms to be considered. Where a bill is bottomed on the unconstitutionality of a statute, it is the duty of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Motlow v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State v. AlstonTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  3. City of Memphis v. State ex rel. RyalsTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State v. McKayTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  5. State ex rel. Stewart v. Louisville & N. R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of Revenue for the State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Estrin v. MossTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hunter v. ConnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. SenterTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Scott v. Nashville Bridge Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API