Legal Opinion

Morf v. Bingaman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 18, 1936No. Nos. 772, 898PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

This case is here on appeal, Judicial Code, § 238, from a decree of the district court for New Mexico, three judges sitting, 12 F. Supp. 755, dismissing the bill of complaint by which appellant sought to enjoin appellee, the state Commissioner of Revenue, from enforcing the provisions of a state law exacting a permit fee' for the privilege of transporting motor vehicles over the highways of the state for purpose of sale.

The statute assailed, Chapter 56 of the New Mexico Session Laws of 1935, denies to all persons the use of the highways of the state for the transportation of any motor…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. New York Ex Rel. Hatch v. ReardonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Graham & Foster v. GoodcellSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. FainblattSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API