Legal Opinion

Cockrum v. Baumgartner

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 2, 1981No. 80-1245, 80-1300 consPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jiganti

The question raised by these two cases, consolidated on appeal, is whether the parents of a healthy child born as a result of a negligently performed sterilization operation or a negligent misdiagnosis of pregnancy, may recover as an element of damages the expenses of raising and educating the child.

In Cockrum v. Baumgartner, the defendant physician attempted to perform a vasectomy upon the plaintiff, Leon Cockrum. The plaintiff returned for a sperm test one month later and was informed by the defendant that the operation was successful. Approximately six weeks after the date of the test,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Troppi v. ScarfMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Sherlock v. Stillwater ClinicSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Sorenson v. Fio RitoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Cockrum v. BaumgartnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Beardsley v. WierdsmaWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Robert Robak and Anna Robak, Cross-Appellants v. United States of America, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  5. Ochs v. BorrelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API