Cockrum v. Baumgartner
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jiganti
The question raised by these two cases, consolidated on appeal, is whether the parents of a healthy child born as a result of a negligently performed sterilization operation or a negligent misdiagnosis of pregnancy, may recover as an element of damages the expenses of raising and educating the child.
In Cockrum v. Baumgartner, the defendant physician attempted to perform a vasectomy upon the plaintiff, Leon Cockrum. The plaintiff returned for a sperm test one month later and was informed by the defendant that the operation was successful. Approximately six weeks after the date of the test,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Troppi v. ScarfMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Sherlock v. Stillwater ClinicSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Sorenson v. Fio RitoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Cockrum v. BaumgartnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Beardsley v. WierdsmaWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- Robert Robak and Anna Robak, Cross-Appellants v. United States of America, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Ochs v. BorrelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.