Legal Opinion

Robert Robak and Anna Robak, Cross-Appellants v. United States of America, Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 17, 1981No. 81-1038, 81-1099PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWYGERT, Senior Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents a question that has never been decided by a federal court of appeals: whether a cause of action exists for wrongful birth. We hold that it does and affirm the judgment of the district court, which awarded damages to the parents of a child born with defects after a doctor had failed to inform the pregnant mother she had rubella. We reverse the judgment of the district court, however, on two issues raised by the parents in a cross-appeal: the calculation of damages and the method of award of attorneys’ fees.

I

In May, 1972, plaintiffs Anna and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Berman v. AllanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Gleitman v. CosgroveSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Pitre v. Opelousas General Hosp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  3. Naccash v. BurgerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  4. Turpin v. SortiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Siemieniec v. Lutheran General HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1987

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API