Legal Opinion

Regents of University of California v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 1996No. A069831PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEIN, J.

The Regents of the University of California (the Regents) seek a writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd.(Z)), 1 challenging the denial of its motion for summary judgment. It is the defendant in a wrongful death action brought by the widow of Norman Roettgen who was killed during a rock climbing class sponsored by the Regents. 2 The complaint alleged that Mr. Roettgen’s fall was the result of defendant’s instructors’ negligence in placing four rope anchors into a single crack system resulting in the release of the line holding Mr. Roettgen. The Regents moved for summary…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kahn v. East Side Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Allan v. Snow Summit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Moser v. RatinoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Bushnell v. Japanese-American Religious & Cultural CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API