Legal Opinion
Allan v. Snow Summit, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 30, 1996No. E016753PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WARD, J.
Plaintiff Gary Allan sued defendant Snow Summit, Inc., (Snow Summit) for injuries he allegedly suffered during a ski lesson. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Snow Summit on the basis of a release and waiver Allan had signed. Allan now appeals. The appeal is without merit; we affirm.
Facts
The moving papers for and against the motion for summary judgment showed the following.
Allan paid for skiing lessons for himself and his girlfriend on February 9, 1993. Snow Summit gave Allan a card in connection with the skiing lessons. The first side of the card contained…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Kahn v. East Side Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Santa Barbara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Marin Storage & Trucking, Inc. v. Benco Contracting & Engineering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Record v. ReasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Lackner v. NorthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.