Legal Opinion
Weinberg v. Geary
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 17, 1997No. 45A03-9612-CV-439PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARRARD, Judge
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Howard J. Weinberg, M.D. and Howard Weinberg, M.D., P.C., (“Dr. Weinberg”) ap peal the jury verdict, and judgment entered thereon, in favor of Joyce Geary and Lloyd Geary (“the Gearys”). The Gearys filed their medical malpractice action against Dr. Weinberg alleging, among several counts, that Dr. Weinberg negligently performed certain cosmetic plastic surgery procedures on Joyce. Following a jury trial, the jury entered its verdict in favor of the Gearys, and awarded the Gearys damages in the amount of $500,000.00.
We affirm.
FACTS
The facts reveal that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Vergara Ex Rel. Vergara v. DoanIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Wright v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Clausen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Martin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mischelle Musser and Michael Musser v. Gentiva Health Services, F/k/a Olsten Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Ford Motor Co. v. AmmermanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Hagerman Construction, Inc. v. CopelandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. CasillasNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
- Gold v. IshakIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.