Legal Opinion
Kay Petroleum Corp. v. Piergrossi
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 27, 1951PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
The plaintiff is a distributor of petroleum products in Hartford County. The defendants are proprietors of a gasoline service station in Plainville. The plaintiff sued the defendants for loss of profits resulting from an admitted breach of contract by the defendants. Judgment was for the plaintiff and the defendants have appealed.
These further facts appear in the finding, which is not subject to correction: Prior to May 31, 1947, the defendants acquired a piece of land in Plainville upon which they desired to erect and operate a gasoline service station. A representative of the plaintiff…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane-Houston Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Finlay v. SwirskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Maguire v. KieselSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Home Pattern Co. v. W. W. Mertz Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Torosyan v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Canaan Oil & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Bertozzi v. McCarthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Foley v. Huntington Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.