Estate of Hastie
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION
I. INTRODUCTION
Timothy Florez appeals from the probate court's determination, following a trial, that two donative transfers of real property by the decedent were invalid. Appellant contends this action by the administrator is barred by the statute of limitations. We disagree and hence affirm.
II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
- Shirk v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rosencrans v. Dover Images, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2011