Legal Opinion

Leiken v. Wilson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1982No. 80-376Published

1Opinion of the Court

445 A.2d 993 (1982)

Lawrence S. LEIKEN, Appellant,

v.

Marie N. WILSON and Otmous Wingate, Jr., Appellees.

No. 80-376.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Submitted March 25, 1981.

Decided June 3, 1982.

Lawrence S. Leiken pro se.

No brief was filed by appellees.

Before KELLY and FERREN, Associate Judges, and PAIR, Associate Judge, Retired.

FERREN, Associate Judge:

We granted this appeal from a decision of the Small Claims Branch because it presents two significant issues that are likely to recur in the administration of small claims as well as elsewhere in the Civil Division: (1) Did the trial court…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Teodore Dorotee Autera v. Manuel Dudley Robinson, Anthony C. Autera v. Manuel Dudley RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  3. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. McKenna v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  5. Ross v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API