Whelpley v. Stoughton
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Van Burén; Buck, J. Assumpsit by Henry Whelpley against Clarissa S. Stoughton on a promissory note. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.'
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This case has been in this court before, and is reported in 112 Mich. 594. On the second trial it was the claim of the plaintiff that James Stoughton, the husband of defendant, was indebted to plaintiff, and, while so indebted, he conveyed his real estate, for an inadequate consideration, to his wife, the defendant; that plaintiff had an interview with Mr. and Mrs. Stoughton, in which he notified them that he should take proceedings to collect his debt; and that, to avoid having the plaintiff take proceedings attacking the validity of the conveyance, Mrs. Stoughton gave her notes for the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Whelpley v. StoughtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bouma v. DuboisMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Dean v. TorrenceMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Swan v. GregoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Preston National Bank v. LeonardMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Riggs v. WhitakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1902