Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Richmond & Danville Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1891PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Civil action, tried at Fall Term, 1890, of Alamance Superior Court, MacRae, J, presiding*. plaintiff’s appeal. The material portions of the complaint are— “That on the 21st day of September, 1889, the plaintiff purchased from defendant’s agent at Haw River a ticket to Burlington, and thereby the defendant contracted with the plaintiff to receive him on its passenger train as a passenger from Haw River station to Burlington station, and for the fare as paid as aforesaid; that…

Read the full summary

Civil action, tried at Fall Term, 1890, of Alamance Superior Court, MacRae, J, presiding*. plaintiff’s appeal. The material portions of the complaint are— “That on the 21st day of September, 1889, the plaintiff purchased from defendant’s agent at Haw River a ticket to Burlington, and thereby the defendant contracted with the plaintiff to receive him on its passenger train as a passenger from Haw River station to Burlington station, and for the fare as paid as aforesaid; that said ticket specified that it was good for that day and train only, and was purchased for the regular passenger train…

1Opinion of the Court

PLAINTIFF'S APPEAL.

The material portions of the complaint are —

"That on 21 September, 1889, the plaintiff purchased from defendant's agent at Haw River a ticket to Burlington, and thereby the defendant contracted with the plaintiff to receive him on its (415) passenger train as a passenger from Haw River station to Burlington station, and for the fare as paid as aforesaid; that said ticket specified that it was good for that day and train only, and was purchased for the regular passenger train due on its western trip at Haw River at an early hour in the morning of said 21 September, 1889;…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New Orleans, Jackson, & Great Northern Railroad v. HurstMississippi Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Branch v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  3. Hodges v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Newton v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Hinson v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Solomon v. . BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API