Legal Opinion
Maxwell v. Lane County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 6, 2002No. 2000-164; A114031PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Respondents Lane County and Darin Gorham petition for reconsideration and modification of our opinion in Maxwell v. Lane County, 178 Or App 210, 35 P3d 1128 (2001). We allow the petition, clarify our holding as follows, and adhere to our previous opinion as so modified.
As we explained in our previous opinion, Gorham sought to rezone 32 acres in Lane County Exception Area 260B-1 from rural residential 10-acre to rural residential 5-acre minimum lot size. A Lane County hearings officer approved the application, and the Lane County Board of Commissioners affirmed. Norm Maxwell appealed to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Yamhill County v. LudwickOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- McKay Creek Valley Association v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Maxwell v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Carlson v. Benton CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Friends of Yamhill County v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Central Oregon Landwatch v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- LandWatch Lane County v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- Delta Property Co. v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- LandWatch Lane County v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024