Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Benton County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 27, 1998No. LUBA 96-105; CA A101109PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Petitioners Moser seek review of LUBA’s decision remanding Benton County’s approval of their application for a “template dwelling” in a forest zone pursuant to ORS 215.750(1). We affirm.

ORS 215.750(l)(a) allows dwellings to be located on land in a forest zone if, along with other criteria that are not at issue now, “the lot or parcel is predominantly composed of soils that are * * * capable of producing” only “0 to 49 cubic feet per acre per year of wood fiber.” See also OAR 660-06-027. The Land Conservation and Development Commission’s (LCDC) rule, codified as OAR 660-06-005(2) defines…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Defense of Animals v. Oregon Health Sciences UniversityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Maxwell v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API