Legal Opinion

McKay Creek Valley Association v. Washington County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 17, 1993No. LUBA 92-115; CA A77482PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*545RICHARDSON, C. J.

Petitioner appealed to LUBA from Washington County’s approval of a dwelling in conjunction with farm use on respondent McCoys’ (respondents) property in an exclusive farm use zone. LUBA remanded the decision, but petitioner seeks our review of LUBA’s rejection of two of its assignments. We affirm.

The county's community development code makes dwellings in conjunction with farm use permitted uses in the zone if, inter alia, they are located “on a lot or parcel” that is operated for certain agricultural or forestry purposes. The term “parcel” is defined in the code and parallels…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. LintzArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Yamhill County v. LudwickOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Woosley v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Central Oregon LandWatch v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Maxwell v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. Marshall v. City of YachatsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Maxwell v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. McKay Creek Valley Association v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API