Legal Opinion

Mark v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 9, 1924No. 23,907PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action on two policies of fire insurance aggregating $3,000 issued by the defendant to the plaintiff on a building in Duluth. The Northern Title Company, a mortgagee of the plaintiff, intervened, claiming that the insurance company agreed but failed to attach a mortgage clause to the policies, making the insurance payable to it, and asked a reformation. The trial court found that the loss was total, decreed a reformation, and directed judgment for the plaintiff for one sum and for the intervener for another, the two sums aggregating $3,000 and interest. The defendant appeals from the judgment.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Washington Fire Insurance v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
  2. Imperial F. Ins. v. DunhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Phenix Ins. v. KerrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  4. Loventhal v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. v. B. S. Rhea & SonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Petition of S. R. A. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Allen v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Antell v. PEARL ASSURANCE CO. LTD.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Baughman v. Niagara Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Paull v. Columbian National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API