Legal Opinion

Paull v. Columbian National Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 14, 1927No. 25,906PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The appeal is by plaintiffs from a judgment of dismissal in an action to reform and recover upon a fire insurance policy.

The facts found are in short these:

One Falkner, a builder, agreed to build a dwelling for plaintiff Pauli upon a lot owned by her in Duluth. In order to finance the undertaking, Pauli deeded the lot to Falkner, who placed a $2,200 mortgage thereon, and then by contract agreed to sell and convey the lot with the dwelling constructed to Pauli, upon being paid $1,800 in monthly instalments, she to assume and pay the mortgage. This all took place on or prior to November 21,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mark v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Matson v. BaumanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  3. Baughman v. Niagara Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cardente v. Maggiacomo Insurance Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  2. Graff v. Robert M. Swendra Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  3. Welsh v. Barnes-Duluth Shipbuilding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. National Surety Corp. v. Michigan Fire & Marine Ins.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1944
  5. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API