People v. Browning
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The appellant was convicted of the crime of abortion. A reversal of the judgment is sought on the ground that a portion of the trial was conducted on a holiday; that the court erred in its charge to the jury and in the reception of testimony, and that both the judge and district attorney were guilty of prejudicial misconduct.
The trial began February 27, 1933, and continued from day to day to and including March 2, 1933. For the protection of the banking business of the state of California which was seriously threatened, the Governor proclaimed March 2d, 3d and 4th as public holidays. Neither…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- French v. SenateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Mullan v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. FewkesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- People v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Silvey v. HarmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. KendrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. ColtrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- People v. QuielCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- People v. EmeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.