Legal Opinion

People v. Collins

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 1935No. Crim. 2607PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, J., pro tem.

Defendant, a chiropractor, was convicted of the crime of abortion (Pen. Code, sec. 274). He appeals from the judgment and order denying motion for new trial on two grounds: (1) insufficiency of evidence, especially lack of corroboration of the patient and her husband, who were accomplices, and (2) misconduct of the trial court.

Mrs. Brant testified that when she went to defendant’s office she told him she was pregnant, that she paid defendant $35 and that he performed certain acts which constituted an abortion. Both she and her husband testified that was the purpose of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  2. People v. BrowningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. People v. BisbinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. People v. MaloneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. People v. HurdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API