Legal Opinion

Irwin v. Holbrook

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1901No. 3905PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Whitman County.- — Hon. William McDonald, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hadley, J.

The material facts alleged in the amended complaint in this cause are that on the 21st day of February, 1885, and for some time prior thereto, the appellant was the owner of certain real estate in Whitman county, which was then covered by a mortgage to one Plimpton to secure a note for $300, with accrued interest. At the same time the appellant was indebted to the First Rational Bank of Colfax on a promissory note for $750 and accrued interest. At the time of the execution of the last named note respondent signed it as surety for appellant.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Estate of SandersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Stearns v. HochbrunnWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Duclos v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Constable v. CampCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  5. Stone v. Town of GloverSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Irwin v. HolbrookWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Miller v. AshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Meck v. BehrensWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Davis v. RogersWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Miller v. HorowitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API