Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Clay

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 13, 1956No. 676PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

While plaintiff alleged that “the defendant was negligent in directing plaintiff’s intestate to weld upon an automobile in a a small enclosed shed which had inadequate room or ventilation,” and further alleged that defendant was negligent “in his failure to assist the plaintiff’s intestate in extinguishing his flaming clothing which resulted from the explosion,” the evidence is insufficient to support either of these allegations.

Decision, in relation to judgment of nonsuit, turns upon the sufficiency of the evidence to support these allegations: “That the paint can which the defendant filled…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Council v. Dickerson's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Ramsbottom v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Ramsbottom v. . RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Hall v. Coble Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Singletary v. NixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Firemen's Mutual Insurance v. High Point Sprinkler Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Hood v. Queen City Coach CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Murray v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Whiteside v. McCarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Westmoreland v. GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API