Legal Opinion

In Re Kalar

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 11, 2011No. 2010-456PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConboy, J.

The petitioner, Patricia M. Kalar, has petitioned for a writ of certiorari, see SUP. Ct. R. 11, challenging the reduction of her benefits by the respondent, the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services (department), pursuant to the Food Stamp Act. See 7 U.S.C. § 2011 (2006); RSA 161:2, XIII (Supp. 2010). We affirm.

The record supports the following facts. The petitioner is the disabled mother of two disabled sons. She has received assistance under the Food Stamp Act since at least April 2006. In July 2006, the department conducted an inquiry into the petitioner’s income and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Traynor v. TurnageSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Robertson v. Las Animas County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  4. Weyer v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Patton v. TIC United Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. William Bovaird v. New Hampshire Department of Administrative ServicesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  2. Petition of Wayne SawyerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
  3. 412 South Broadway Realty, LLC & a. v. John M. Wolters, Jr. & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
  4. Hansa Consult of North America, LLC v. Hansaconsult Ingenieurgesellschaft mbHSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  5. Town of Carroll v. RinesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API