Legal Opinion
In re Poulicakos
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided June 30, 2010No. 2009-266PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The petitioner, Michael Poulicakos, appeals a decision of the respondent, New Hampshire Retirement System (NHRS), denying him accidental disability retirement (ADR) benefits. We affirm.
The record supports the following facts. The petitioner was employed as a corrections officer by the State of New Hampshire Department of Corrections (DOC). As such, he was a group II member of NHRS. See RSA 100-A:1, VII, :1, X(b) (2001) (defining group II members to include permanent policemen, and permanent policemen to include certain corrections personnel). On June 30, 2006, the petitioner instituted a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Trustees of the Phillips-Exeter Academy v. ExeterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943
- State Employees Ass'n Local 1984 v. New Hampshire Division of PersonnelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- New England Brickmaster, Inc. v. Town of SalemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- In Re Concord Teachers (Nh Ret. System)Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- In Re Farmington Teachers Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- William Bovaird v. New Hampshire Department of Administrative ServicesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Appeal of MaysSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- In Re State Employees'ass'n of NhSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- In Re DunnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.