United States v. Claudio Romo-Chavez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Concurrence by Judge BERZON.
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether the Confrontation Clause or the Federal Rules of Evidence prohibit the government from introducing at trial a defendant’s admissions to a police officer because the translator who facilitated them, while conversationally fluent, would not qualify as a court interpreter.
I
Claudio Romo-Chavez is a citizen and national of Mexico. In May 2009, he attempted to enter this country at the De-Concini Port of Entry in Nogales, Arizona, driving a 1999 Buick Century. During primary…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Illinois v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Todd FriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Aifang YeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Aifang YeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- (HC) Townsend v. NevschmidDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Allen v. CampbellDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.