Legal Opinion

United States v. Claudio Romo-Chavez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 23, 2012No. 10-10424PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Concurrence by Judge BERZON.

OPINION

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether the Confrontation Clause or the Federal Rules of Evidence prohibit the government from introducing at trial a defendant’s admissions to a police officer because the translator who facilitated them, while conversationally fluent, would not qualify as a court interpreter.

I

Claudio Romo-Chavez is a citizen and national of Mexico. In May 2009, he attempted to enter this country at the De-Concini Port of Entry in Nogales, Arizona, driving a 1999 Buick Century. During primary…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Illinois v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Todd FriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Aifang YeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Aifang YeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. (HC) Townsend v. NevschmidDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  5. Allen v. CampbellDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API