United States v. Aifang Ye
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judge:
Following a jury trial, Aifang Ye appeals her convictions relating to the provision of false information on a passport application. She argues that the district court’s jury instructions erroneously failed to condition her convictions on a finding that she intended to violate the passport laws. We hold that the crimes for which Ye was convicted are not specific intent crimes, so her challenges to the jury instructions fail. Ye’s additional argument that the government’s failure to call certain translators as witnesses at trial violated her rights under the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Nyle ChurchwellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Lebreault FelizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Aifang YeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Ivan Lozano v. Warren L. MontgomeryDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
- United States v. Aifang YeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015