Legal Opinion

United States v. Aifang Ye

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 10, 2015No. 12-10576PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The opinion filed July 10, 2015, appearing at 792 F.3d 1164, is hereby amended as follows:

The language of footnote 2 is added to the opinion:

Ye is correct that in Bryan v. United States, 524 U.S. 184, 118 S.Ct. 1939, 141 L.Ed.2d 197 (1998), the Supreme Court interpreted “willfully” to mean “undertaken with a bad purpose,” id. at 191, 118 S.Ct. 1939, and “with knowledge that [the defendant’s] conduct was unlawful,” id. at 192, 118 S.Ct. 1939 (quoting Ratzlaf v. United States, 510 U.S. 135, 137, 114 S.Ct. 655, 126 L.Ed.2d 615 (1994)). At the same time, however, the Court acknowledged that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. PrimroseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API